<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compassionate Conservatism: Huh?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://globalinvestmentwatch.com/compassionate-conservatism-huh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://globalinvestmentwatch.com/compassionate-conservatism-huh/</link>
	<description>Connecting Human Rights, Politics and Capital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 23:39:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Malnurtured Snay</title>
		<link>http://globalinvestmentwatch.com/compassionate-conservatism-huh/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Malnurtured Snay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://globalinvestmentwatch.com/?p=590#comment-382</guid>
		<description>So, essentially, &quot;Compassionate Conservatism&quot; means Big Spending Republicans.  If they were Democrats, Limbaugh&#039;s crowd would be calling them socialists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, essentially, &#8220;Compassionate Conservatism&#8221; means Big Spending Republicans.  If they were Democrats, Limbaugh&#8217;s crowd would be calling them socialists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
