Posts tagged as:

Banco Santander

monopoly banker1 150x150 Global Witness Demands Responsibility from International BanksThis month the UK-based NGO Global Witness issued a new report asserting that major international banks perpetuate corruption in the world’s most fragile countries. This is not a new assertion by any means, but in these times when the nefarious impact of unbridled greed has put the global economy in jeopardy, it is a particularly urgent message. The demand by shareholders for corporate responsibility is growing, but it still has a long way to go.

“The same lax regulation that created the credit crunch has let some of the world’s biggest banks facilitate the looting of natural resource wealth from poor countries,” said Gavin Hayman, Global Witness Campaigns Director. ‘If resources like oil, gas and minerals are to truly help lift Africa and other poor regions out of poverty, then governments must take responsibility to stop banks doing business with corrupt dictators and their families.”

Global Witness’s report, Undue Diligence: How banks do business with corrupt regimes, highlights the following examples:

  • Barclays kept open an account for the son of the dictator of oil-rich Equatorial Guinea long after clear evidence emerged that his family were heavily involved in substantial looting of state oil revenues.
  • Citibank facilitated the funding of two vicious civil wars in Sierra Leone and Liberia by enabling the warlord Charles Taylor, now on trial for war crimes in the Hague, to loot timber revenues.
  • HSBC and Banco Santander hid behind bank secrecy laws in Luxembourg and Spain to frustrate US efforts to find out if Equatorial Guinea’s oil revenues had been looted and laundered.
  • Deutsche Bank assisted the late president Niyazov of Turkmenistan, a notorious human rights abuser, to keep billions of dollars of state gas revenues under his personal control and off the national budget.

Global Witness presents the following action plan:

  • Banks must change their culture of ‘due diligence’ – the process by which they check that a customer is legitimate. This isn’t about box ticking. Banks should only take the business if they have identified an ultimate beneficiary who does not pose a corruption risk. Other business should be turned away.

[click to continue...]

Popularity: 2% [?]

Sphere: Related Content

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

High Noon

by John Richardson on January 28, 2009

highnoonclock High NoonA noontime roundup of business and politics.

It’s a Bird, It’s a Plane! No, It’s HubrisMan!

In today’s Financial Times, the new Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner had to make the call to Citibank officials to tell them that it might not be a wise idea to buy that $50 million jet they recently ordered. It seems that executive hubris know no limits at Citibank.

FT.com

Santander Covers It’s Madoff Losses

Banco Santander, the Spanish bank, announced that it would repay victims of the Bernie Madoff fraud in an attempt to stave off lawsuits and preserve its reputation. 

FT.com

Sen. Chris Dodd Get’s Bailout Money?

OpenSecrets.org reports that Senator Chris Dodd, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs and is now charged with shaping legislation to jump-start the economy and help floundering companies is getting some bailout money of his own, to wit:

Dodd’s most generous donors include many of the companies that have filed for bankruptcy or sought government help over the last six months: Citigroup ($428,300), Morgan Stanley ($211,300), American Insurance Group ($280,250) and Lehman Brothers ($154,300). Despite the companies’ support, when the Senate was called on this month to release the second half of the $700 billion bailout money, Dodd called for stronger oversight provisions and limits on executive compensation for the companies receiving a handout.

Senator, perhaps the guys at Citigroup will let you borrow their plane.

Opensecrets.org

Popularity: 7% [?]

Sphere: Related Content

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

In this edition of our weekly video, 2N2, Rob Kellogg discusses two companies: Banco Santander, a Spanish banking company and BAE Systems, a U.K. based aerospace and defense company.

YouTube Preview Image

Popularity: 11% [?]

Sphere: Related Content

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Tax Fraud is Not Tax Policy

by John Richardson on November 11, 2008

istock 000006506463xsmall Tax Fraud is Not Tax PolicyHow the Bush Treasury Department Helped its Friends and Screwed America

In the waning days of the criminal enterprise known as the Bush Administration, it has been revealed that the Treasury Department has granted massive tax breaks to corporations while world attention is focused on other matters.  A windfall of possibly $140 billion was achieved when a provision of the tax code was changed by a slight of hand.

No one in the Administration is taking direct credit for this fraud. However, the ideological underpinnings can be traced back to a 2007 memo written by two tax policy officials, Eric Solomon and Robert Carroll. The elimination of the “offending” rule serves as tribute to the infamous “torture” memoranda issued by the U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, which was used as the legal underpinning for allowing waterboarding and other forms of prisoner abuse.

The Treasury Department memo sanctions the elimination of an I.R.S. rule that was established more than 20 years ago.  In 1986, Section 382 of the tax code was established to limit the sheltering of profits through the creation of shell companies whose only “value” were the losses they held.  This situation arose often in situations where a company acquired another company that was losing money. The losses from the acquired company could be used to offset profits made at the acquiring company.

While the idea of offsetting profits from losses incurred by buying another company may be subject to some debate and regulatory evaluation in the arcane world of tax policy, the Bush Administration and the Treasury Department bypassed the whole exercise through executive fiat.

Rather than go through a regulatory review process, consult with Congress or engage in some other form of democratic process, the Treasury Department wiped the slate clean and opened the door for a massive gift to the banking industry. The rule change came just 24 hours after Congress voted down the original bailout legislation in October. A number of experts named by The Washington Post suggest that this move was patently illegal.

Benefiting from this change were several major banks that have reaped the rewards of this fraud. Wells Fargo Bank is at the top of that list.

The Wells Fargo Ruling

Wells Fargo Bank was looking to acquire Wachovia Bank.  Wells Fargo had made some furtive attempts at acquiring Wachovia but had walked away from the deal because the numbers didn’t work. However, once Section 382 was eliminated, it created a $25 billion incentive for Wells Fargo and the deal went through within hours.

According to the Washington Post, two more bank mergers were completed on the coattails of this regulatory scheme. PNC acquired National City and saw a $5.1 billion savings from the repealed regulation. Banco Santander bought Sovereign Bancorp and is expected to see a $2 billion savings from the change in the law.

By one account, this questionable regulatory action will cost taxpayers as much as $140 billion in lost tax revenues. Unfortunately, the floodgates have been opened and to disallow the tax breaks granted to these companies in the current economic climate would ensure a possible meltdown in the capital markets.  Somehow, hearing Treasury Secretary Paulson announcing to the public that “we made a mistake and the repealed tax rule will now go back into effect. Wells Fargo, you now owe us $5 billion in taxes,” sounds like financial suicide even to the economic anarchists amongst us.

The Means Justify the Ends

I am reminded of an interview I heard on National Public Radio shortly after 9/11. Interviewed by Diane Rehm, Lynn Chaney, the wife of Vice President Chaney made the argument that the use of torture was justified as a means to an end – the protection of America – regardless of it illegality under the Constitution. The trumpets of corruption blare as the anthem for all subsequent deregulation, refusal to enforce laws and convoluted interpretation of the law that have been the hallmarks of this administration.

Undoubtedly the Treasury officials responsible for this fraud believe that the means justified the ends. However, when the rule of law gets tossed out the window, far greater risk is imposed on the American system of government, which is in tatters from its many years of manipulation by the Administration and its friends in high places.

Of course, we are now learning today that this shadow governance is not limited to the financial world. In today’s papers, it’s reported that George Bush’s Defense Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld issued a secret memo that authorized incursions into other countries to pursue terrorists.

Popularity: 3% [?]

Sphere: Related Content

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }