Posts tagged as:

code of conduct

Chevron: Burning Oil for the Environment?

by John Richardson on November 21, 2008

img 0253 Chevron: Burning Oil for the Environment?

Is it just me or does anybody else find corporate ad campaigns eschewing social responsibility a bit duplicitous?

I was standing on the subway platform in Washington DC this weekend. Looking around, I saw this ad sponsored by Chevron.  They have been waging this campaign on billboards and television for a while now touting all things sustainable: save energy, turn off lights, drive a hybrid car, and so on.  These are nice virtues that we can all agree with. The problem is I am being told to be more environmentally responsible by a FREAKING OIL COMPANY!

Here is my question: Do campaigns and non-core business activities like this serve the public interest or is this really just a bad publicity stunt that wastes money?

From a corporate social responsibility perspective, I want to see companies behave better and be responsible to all stakeholders. The problem is that I often notice that companies choose form over substance: a corporate ad campaign condemning energy use or smoking cigarettes (Chevron, RJR), charitable giving while destroying social infrastructure (Wal-Mart), helping children while undermining public health (McDonalds).  For those of us looking at and evaluating companies from a social and environmental perspective, it’s easy to take a quick look at what a company says it does and give them a thumbs up or down. Sustainability reports, charitible giving and codes of conduct are nice to see but at the end of the day, does it really matter? Isn’t what companies “do” as companies the primary if not the only factor by which we should measure their true responsibility?

I invite your comments on this question. I would also like to hear from you about examples of what you would consider corporate social hypocrisy. Email me at info@jmr-financial.com

Popularity: 8% [?]

Sphere: Related Content

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 2 comments }

In this edition of our weekly video, 2N2, Rob Kellogg discusses two companies: Banco Santander, a Spanish banking company and BAE Systems, a U.K. based aerospace and defense company.

YouTube Preview Image

Popularity: 11% [?]

Sphere: Related Content

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Standard Chartered: A Banker for the World

by John Richardson on November 15, 2008

In this video, Global Investment Watch’s John Richardson assesses Standard Chartered plc, a global banking concern.

YouTube Preview Image

Popularity: 2% [?]

Sphere: Related Content

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Veolia Environnement: A Glass Half Empty?

by John Richardson on November 6, 2008

istock 000003074001xsmall 200x300 Veolia Environnement: A Glass Half Empty?Veolia Environnement is not a household name in America. It should be.

The company  specializes in water services, as well as waste management, energy, and transportation operations. According to Public Services International, a book called The Water Business by journalist Ann-Christin Sjölander looks at the privatization of water around the world. Today, Veolia and Suez-Ondeo, control 80% of the international private water market, with some 300 million customers. Protests have broken out in country after country – Bolivia, Argentina, Ghana, South Africa – and the water giants are switching to new markets in China, North America and Europe. Meanwhile well over a billion people still lack access to clean water supplies.

It’s About What You Do Not What You Say

Like many other major companies, Veolia has a code of conduct that suggests that the company does “the right thing.” On paper, the company looks like a responsible corporate citizen. It has a published code of conduct that includes provisions addressing human rights, the environment, health and safety, community investment and international labor standards. It has adopted the principles set forth in the U.N. Global Compact. Since 2004, Veolia Environnement has undertaken international campaigns with children, teachers and government agencies that support various initiatives. Campaigns have been launched in more than 30 countries, involving thousands of children.

However, in practice, things aren’t nearly as tidy.

As reported by Adri Nieuwhof of The Electronic Intifada in June 2008, Veolia has contracted to build a tramway on illegally seized Palestinian land that connects Israeli settlements on the West Bank, constructed in open violation of international law, with neighborhoods in West Jerusalem. Over the past two years, SNS Bank, ranked in the top-five of Dutch banks, received many letters from Israeli, Palestinian and Dutch organizations and international law experts calling for divestment from Veolia, because of the company’s involvement in the tramway project. Association Solidarite France Palestine and the Palestinian Liberation Organization have taken legal action in France against Veolia, but it appears that the company is not backing away from the project.

In an October 2007 article entitled “Water privateers reap ‘astronomical profits’”, Canadian Union CUPE reports on a study that says French water multinationals Veolia and Suez are making ‘astronomical profits’ in France – where they control much of the market – while delivering low-level services. The French consumers’ association Union Fédérale des consommateurs (UFC) has released a study showing the huge profit margins many French water corporations enjoy. The high water mark is in the community of Ile-de-France, where the private operator pockets a 58.7 per cent profit margin on citizens’ water payments, according to UFC. The association found a similar pattern of “explosive” profits in other cities with private water. In contrast, cities with public ownership and management, including the city of Grenoble, had profit margins in the range of 10 to 15 per cent. In 2000, Grenoble citizens won a long battle to bring water services back into public hands, ending a regime notorious for overpricing and corruption. The study, a follow-up to a 2006 survey of price structures, found that few water corporations had changed their profiteering ways. Only private operations in Angers and Nantes had dropped their profit margins. UFC calls some of the pricing practices “abusive.” The association is calling on municipal governments to bring water services back into public hands.

In October 2006, TSSA – the Transport Salaried Staffs’ Association – a UK based union for people in transport and travel, stated that, “The track record of Veolia Environnement (formerly Connex) is not good. The French company was found guilty of breaking employment law in the UK, it lost its south eastern rail franchise, and is now accused of complicity in Israel’s annexation of East Jerusalem.”

Access to a basic water requirement is a fundamental human right implicitly supported by international law, declarations, and State practice. Arguably, this right to water is even more basic and vital than some of the more explicit human rights already acknowledged by the international community, as can be seen by its recognition in many local customary laws, traditions or religious canon. With so much at risk for the world’s people, Veolia Environement’s role and influence over the lives of so many inhabitants cannot be ignored.

Popularity: 2% [?]

Sphere: Related Content

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Syngenta Fails to Germinate

by John Richardson on October 6, 2008

Syngenta AG is a large global agribusiness, which markets seeds and crop protection products (pesticides). syngenta field logo 300x204 Syngenta Fails to GerminateSyngenta is involved in biotechnology and genomic research. The company is a leader in crop protection, and ranks third in total sales in the commercial agricultural seeds market. Sales in 2007 were approximately US$ 9.2 billion. Syngenta employs over 21,000 people in over 90 countries. Syngenta is listed on the Swiss stock exchange (SWX: SYNN) and in New York NYSE: SYT. [click to continue...]

Popularity: 8% [?]

Sphere: Related Content

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 2 comments }

VerizonComing , under pressure from Washington DC area NGOs, Verizon Communications announced yesterday that it would withhold payments from its contractors who don’t pay their immigrant laborers wages and overtime. As reported by the Washington Post (June 24, 2008: D4), a company spokeswoman said that it would withhold work from contractors found to have acted improperly.

“If it is true that workers are not being paid by subcontractors … Verizon will take the proper course of action,” stated Sandra Arnette, a Verizon spokesman.

Interestingly, a review of the company’s Supplier Code of Contact as it pertains to labor states:

Suppliers of products or services produced in or provided from the United States shall comply with all applicable federal, state and/or local laws and regulations. Suppliers of products or services produced or provided from outside the United States shall comply with applicable laws and regulations of relevant countries. However, regardless of applicable laws and regulations, suppliers must uphold the human rights of workers by treating them with dignity and respect.

Nothing in its Code suggests that exploited workers can be assured that the company will take substantive steps to protect them. The Code itself does not spell out specific steps it will take to address these workers concerns nor does the company spell out what it would consider as evidence of wage and hour violations.

This raises a fundamental question for all companies with respect to how they address supplier conduct vis-a-vis the contractors’ employees. In addition, though a company may have a Code of Conduct, this in and of itself does not fully address the company’s actual practices. In the case of Verizon, putting theory into practice will reveal a great deal.

Popularity: 5% [?]

Sphere: Related Content

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }