Posts tagged as:

UBS

Contracts? We Don’t Need No Stinking Contracts!

by John Richardson on March 18, 2009

03 21 06 alfonso bedoya Contracts? We Dont Need No Stinking Contracts!As pundits and politicians bloviate about retention bonuses and the citizenry storm the citadels of Wall Street and any other place they can find an AIG executive, the financial mice, i.e. Treasury officials, are scurrying about delivering financial plague to the world’s population.

Well not exactly a plague, more of a Madoffian disease that, if detected early enough, could have been cured – sort of like an STD caught early. As the AIG mess plays out, it seems that the American people look to be the odd men (and women) out in this financial scam. They get the cure, we get . . . well, you know what I mean.

What I am speaking of here in real terms is the gargantuan payouts made by AIG using taxpayer money to the recipients of the financial insurance policies AIG has written to banks around the world. These policies, which we all now know as credit default swaps, are being paid in full to the institutions that have screwed up in investing in bad real estate securities.

After considerable cajoling by the U.S. government, on March 15th AIG disclosed the names of counter-parties receiving more than $108 billion in taxpayer funds. Of that amount, $52 billion was used to satisfy or exit credit default swaps, insurance contracts on securities, which are at the heart of the problem with the failing insurer.

A counter-party, it should be noted, is the insurer provided coverage by the insurance company (in this case, AIG) for its losses suffered from its bad investments, like, securitized mortgages.

In other words, AIG provided insurance to protect the best and the brightest on Wall Street and in other capital markets around the world in the event they did something really stupid. Ooopsie! My bad.

“Though it is now known who the counter-parties are, AIG refused to itemize what exactly it is each of them brought to the table. As a result, it’s impossible to know if some firms got better deals than others, or if taxpayers got a raw deal all together.”  Forbes.com

European banks lead the list with Societe Generale receiving $6.9 billion, Deutsche Bank walked away with $2.8 billion; UBS did a little two-step with $2.5 billion. Back at home, Goldman Sachs received $5.6 billion and Merrill Lynch locked up a paltry $3.1 billion.

Per existing swap agreements, AIG had to post $22.4 billion in collateral where the underlying investments were downgraded. Societe General received $4.1 billion; Deutsche Bank, $2.6 billion; Goldman, $2.5 billion; and Merrill, $1.8 billion. Forbes.com

AIG also had to post $43.7 billion during the quarter to unwind its securities lending business and $12.1 billion to different municipalities that had guaranteed investment policies. California and Virginia received $1 billion each.

Great.

As Elliot Spitzer, former N.Y. Governor and Wall Street pit bull noted yesterday on Slate.com:

It all appears, once again, to be the same insiders protecting themselves against sharing the pain and risk of their own bad adventure. The payments to AIG’s counterparties are justified with an appeal to the sanctity of contract. If AIG’s contracts turned out to be shaky, the theory goes, then the whole edifice of the financial system would collapse . . . But wait a moment, aren’t we in the midst of reopening contracts all over the place to share the burden of this crisis? From raising taxes-income taxes to sales taxes-to properly reopening labor contracts, we are all being asked to pitch in and carry our share of the burden. Workers around the country are being asked to take pay cuts and accept shorter workweeks so that colleagues won’t be laid off. Why can’t Wall Street royalty shoulder some of the burden?

Good point Elliot. Everybody is expected to make some sacrifices here. Oh, except for the banks.

It was only a few weeks ago when investors and “concerned” business leaders were condemning the autoworkers union and its members for having the temerity to maintain their collective bargaining agreements with the U.S. automakers. The average autoworker was making a whopping $70 an hour benefits included. Now, the Treasury Department has somehow overlooked the fact that the counterparties are getting paid in full, no questions asked. Take at $70 and hour, slap nine zeros on it and nobody is the wiser.

Apparently contracts only matter when Geithner’s pals over at Goldman need protection. After all, the world is at risk. What about contracts to protect you and me (think taxes, collective bargaining agreements, and so on). Don’t they matter? Not so much.

Popularity: 11% [?]

Sphere: Related Content

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 2 comments }

The Rise of Sovereign Wealth Funds, Part I

by Rob Kellogg on October 17, 2008

Editor’s note: This article is the first in a four-part series on the rise of sovereign wealth funds and what they mean for U.S. investors. Part II will appear next Friday on GIW.

Rolling Snake Eyes

For those of you who have played craps, you know that it can be a pretty easy game to win at, even when you really don’t know what you’re doing. When someone is on a hot streak, everyone at the table can partake in the winnings. A mistock 000004350450xsmall 300x199 The Rise of Sovereign Wealth Funds, Part Iain nemesis in the game is rolling the dreaded “snake eyes” (what’s known as a pair of pips among gamblers). Interestingly, and perhaps not coincidentally for our purposes here, the etymology of the reference traces back to 1929 – the onset of the Great Depression.

Several months ago, sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) from Singapore, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi and Korea stepped up to the table to test their luck. These five government-sponsored funds went high stakes with their chips by collectively pouring nearly $60 billion into Citigroup, UBS and Merrill Lynch. These “experts” (bolstered by their outside advisors) were confidant that the sell-off which had rampaged Wall Street beginning in mid-2007 and continuing into early 2008 had reached its end. They thought they were correctly timing their purchase at the bottom of the downturn. No such luck. There was more carnage to come. Snake eyes all around.

Still smarting from their dramatic losses, many of these funds were invited in June to return to Casino High Finance, this time by Lehman Brothers. But unfortunately for Richard Fuld and his band of con artists, the managers at these funds had learned their lesson and declined the invitation to return to Las Vegas for one more roll of the dice. We will never know if that second roll would have brought more misery or good fortune, but something tells me the odds favored the house.

[click to continue...]

Popularity: 21% [?]

Sphere: Related Content

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }